Filter by
Since 1935, Perkins and Will has created innovative and award-winning designs for the world’s most forward-thinking clients. They are architects, interior designers, urban designers, landscape architects, consultants, and branded environment experts who approach design from all scales and perspectives.
They combine a deeply humanistic approach with results-driven pragmatism to create dynamic spaces for people. Research-focused and inventive, every day they reimagine how space can be used to foster stronger ties between communities, the built environment, and nature.
Their transformative designs help students learn better, patients heal faster, business teams perform stronger, and city dwellers have more meaningful daily experiences.
Architecture; Historical Preservation; Interior Design; Landscape Architecture; Urban Design
Membership Level
Gold
Member Since
2008
Member Offices
Chicago
Please note that all heights shown in italics/red are estimated heights. These have been calculated based on known floor counts for the building, then extrapolated through analyzing typically hundreds of buildings of the same function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard building features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of these estimations.
Rank |
Name |
Status
Completed Architecturally Topped Out Structurally Topped Out Under Construction On Hold Proposed Vision Never Completed Demolished Competition Entry Canceled Proposed Renovation Under Renovation Renovated Under Demolition |
Height |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
265 m / 869 ft |
||
2 |
264.6 m / 868 ft |
||
3 |
240 m / 787 ft |
||
4 |
235 m / 771 ft |
||
5 |
222.5 m / 730 ft |
||
6 |
214.9 m / 705 ft |
||
7 |
200 m / 656 ft |
||
8 |
193.9 m / 636 ft |
||
9 |
187.8 m / 616 ft |
||
10 |
187.5 m / 615 ft |
CTBUH Regional Representative, Atlanta, 2014 – Present
CTBUH Advisory Group, 2018 – Present
28 April 2020
The pandemic crisis of COVID-19 has catalyzed a shockwave of action throughout the AEC industry like never before. The CTBUH Chicago Chapter presents a virtual...
20 April 2017
River Beech Tower: A Tall Timber Experiment
The Chicago River Beech Tower is a collaborative research effort with the goal of identifying challenges and opportunities associated with designing increasingly tall mass timber...
20 April 2022
One-Hundred-Meter Tall Residential Building Using Load-Bearing Timber Proposed for Winterthur
Danish studio Schmidt Hammer Lassen has revealed its design for a 100-meter-tall housing block in Switzerland. Named Rocket&Tigerli, the terracotta-clad building is set to be...
Please note that all heights shown in italics/red are estimated heights. These have been calculated based on known floor counts for the building, then extrapolated through analyzing typically hundreds of buildings of the same function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard building features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of these estimations.
Rank |
Name |
City |
Completion |
Height |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
- |
610 m / 2,000 ft |
||
2 |
- |
280 m / 920 ft |
||
3 |
1989 |
265 m / 869 ft |
||
4 |
1969 |
265 m / 868 ft |
||
5 |
- |
264 m / 866 ft |
||
6 |
- |
260 m / 853 ft |
||
7 |
2021 |
240 m / 787 ft |
||
8 |
2014 |
235 m / 771 ft |
||
9 |
- |
228 m / 748 ft |
||
10 |
2023 |
223 m / 730 ft |
||
11 |
- |
216 m / 709 ft |
||
12 |
- |
215 m / 705 ft |
||
13 |
- |
213 m / 699 ft |
||
14 |
2020 |
200 m / 656 ft |
||
15 |
2017 |
194 m / 636 ft |
||
16 |
- |
188 m / 616 ft |
||
17 |
1983 |
188 m / 615 ft |
||
18 |
- |
182 m / 598 ft |
||
19 |
- |
180 m / 590 ft |
||
20 |
2009 |
180 m / 589 ft |
||
21 |
2010 |
173 m / 568 ft |
||
22 |
1990 |
171 m / 560 ft |
||
23 |
- |
168 m / 550 ft |
||
24 |
- |
164 m / 538 ft |
||
25 |
2015 |
161 m / 527 ft |
||
26 |
- |
160 m / 525 ft |
||
27 |
- |
157 m / 516 ft |
||
28 |
2020 |
150 m / 493 ft |
||
29 |
2020 |
150 m / 492 ft |
||
30 |
2010 |
149 m / 490 ft |
||
31 |
1983 |
149 m / 487 ft |
||
32 |
2010 |
148 m / 484 ft |
||
33 |
1990 |
147 m / 481 ft |
||
34 |
- |
146 m / 480 ft |
||
35 |
2017 |
146 m / 478 ft |
||
36 |
2014 |
141 m / 463 ft |
||
37 |
2021 |
140 m / 458 ft |
||
38 |
- |
138 m / 451 ft |
||
39 |
2023 |
136 m / 447 ft |
||
40 |
1976 |
136 m / 445 ft |
||
41 |
2017 |
135 m / 444 ft |
||
42 |
2020 |
134 m / 440 ft |
||
43 |
1986 |
133 m / 435 ft |
||
44 |
1989 |
132 m / 433 ft |
||
45 |
2003 |
128 m / 421 ft |
||
46 |
- |
127 m / 418 ft |
||
47 |
1974 |
127 m / 415 ft |
||
48 |
2021 |
126 m / 413 ft |
||
49 |
1973 |
124 m / 407 ft |
||
50 |
- |
124 m / 407 ft |
||
51 |
2009 |
120 m / 394 ft |
||
52 |
2009 |
116 m / 381 ft |
||
53 |
2007 |
114 m / 375 ft |
||
54 |
- |
114 m / 374 ft |
||
55 |
2012 |
112 m / 368 ft |
||
56 |
1970 |
108 m / 353 ft |
||
57 |
1984 |
107 m / 352 ft |
||
58 |
2015 |
107 m / 351 ft |
||
59 |
2014 |
106 m / 346 ft |
||
60 |
2019 |
105 m / 345 ft |
||
61 |
2022 |
105 m / 345 ft |
||
61 |
2022 |
105 m / 345 ft |
||
63 |
2020 |
104 m / 342 ft |
||
64 |
1985 |
103 m / 338 ft |
||
65 |
- |
102 m / 335 ft |
||
66 |
- |
101 m / 331 ft |
||
67 |
2021 |
101 m / 330 ft |
||
67 |
2021 |
101 m / 330 ft |
||
69 |
2026 |
100 m / 328 ft |
||
70 |
1980 |
99 m / 325 ft |
||
71 |
2021 |
99 m / 325 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 29 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
72 |
2018 |
98 m / 321 ft |
||
73 |
1979 |
96 m / 316 ft |
||
74 |
- |
96 m / 315 ft |
||
75 |
1974 |
95 m / 310 ft |
||
76 |
- |
94 m / 308 ft |
||
77 |
2018 |
92 m / 302 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 27 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
77 |
2020 |
92 m / 302 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 27 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
79 |
2018 |
91 m / 297 ft |
||
80 |
- |
90 m / 296 ft |
||
81 |
1963 |
90 m / 295 ft |
||
81 |
1963 |
90 m / 295 ft |
||
83 |
1969 |
90 m / 295 ft |
||
84 |
2015 |
89 m / 292 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 26 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
84 |
2021 |
89 m / 292 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 26 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
86 |
2015 |
87 m / 287 ft |
||
87 |
2018 |
87 m / 285 ft |
||
88 |
2021 |
85 m / 280 ft |
||
89 |
2008 |
84 m / 276 ft |
||
90 |
- |
79 m / 259 ft |
||
91 |
2015 |
78 m / 256 ft |
||
92 |
2014 |
77 m / 253 ft |
||
92 |
2014 |
77 m / 253 ft |
||
94 |
2018 |
77 m / 253 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 17 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 318 other buildings of the same office / retail function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
95 |
2012 |
77 m / 252 ft |
||
96 |
2010 |
77 m / 252 ft |
||
97 |
2010 |
75 m / 246 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 22 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
97 |
2010 |
75 m / 246 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 22 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
99 |
- |
74 m / 243 ft |
||
100 |
2016 |
68 m / 223 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 20 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
101 |
1963 |
67 m / 220 ft |
||
102 |
2013 |
62 m / 205 ft |
||
103 |
2016 |
61 m / 200 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 18 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
103 |
2016 |
61 m / 200 ft
Please note that this height is estimated, based on a floor count of 18 floors. The estimation has been arrived at by analyzing 8,475 other buildings of the same residential function on this database that do have confirmed heights. The user should be aware that non-standard features, such as significant spires or raised entrances / podiums, may affect the accuracy of this estimation.
|
||
105 |
- |
55 m / 180 ft |
||
106 |
2020 |
54 m / 177 ft |
||
107 |
- |
52 m / 171 ft |
||
107 |
- |
52 m / 171 ft |
||
109 |
- |
46 m / 151 ft |
||
110 |
2008 |
38 m / 125 ft |
||
110 |
2006 |
38 m / 125 ft |
||
112 |
2005 |
32 m / 105 ft |
||
113 |
- |
31 m / 102 ft |
||
114 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
115 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
116 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
117 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
118 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
119 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
120 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
121 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
122 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
122 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
122 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
125 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
126 |
2022 |
- m / - ft |
||
126 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
128 |
2018 |
- m / - ft |
||
128 |
2022 |
- m / - ft |
||
130 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
130 |
2026 |
- m / - ft |
||
132 |
2023 |
- m / - ft |
||
132 |
2021 |
- m / - ft |
||
132 |
2022 |
- m / - ft |
||
135 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
135 |
2006 |
- m / - ft |
||
137 |
2021 |
- m / - ft |
||
138 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
138 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
138 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
138 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
138 |
- |
- m / - ft |
||
138 |
- |
- m / - ft |
150 m+ Buildings
Average Building Age*
17 Years
Most Common Function*
Residential (45%), 40 Buildings
Most Common Material*
Concrete (80%), 49 Buildings
* Based on 150 m+ buildings currently in the database.
*Based on 88 Completed & Under Construction Buildings
NOTE: Construction start time is not available for all buildings. The average construction time is only displayed if there is three or more buildings with construction start and complete data in that year.
Create your own charts using the Explore Data tool.
CTBUH Regional Representative, Atlanta, 2014 – Present
28 April 2020 | Online Event
The pandemic crisis of COVID-19 has catalyzed a shockwave of action throughout the AEC industry like never before. The CTBUH Chicago Chapter presents a virtual...
20 April 2017
River Beech Tower: A Tall Timber Experiment
The Chicago River Beech Tower is a collaborative research effort with the goal of identifying challenges and opportunities associated with designing increasingly tall mass timber...
01 August 2010
The High-rise as a Retirement Community
As cities are becoming denser, the functions of high-rises are expanding. In addition, the central business district is no longer the exclusive region of the...
20 April 2022
One-Hundred-Meter Tall Residential Building Using Load-Bearing Timber Proposed for Winterthur
Danish studio Schmidt Hammer Lassen has revealed its design for a 100-meter-tall housing block in Switzerland. Named Rocket&Tigerli, the terracotta-clad building is set to be...
25 February 2022
Major Hotel Brand Ends Partnership with Chicago High-Rise Hotel
As they stare down a US$70 million foreclosure lawsuit, the owners of the Conrad Chicago hotel have split with Hilton Worldwide as the shuttered inn's...
15 February 2022
First Tower of Surrey Complex Moves Forward to Launch
One of the largest mixed-use, multi-tower developments within Surrey City Centre is moving forward with the launch of its first phase of condominium sales. In February,...
22 September 2021
Chicago Residential Project Along the Chicago River Underway
Lendlease recently celebrated breaking ground on The Reed, a 41-story, 440-residence community at 234 W. Polk St. in Chicago’s Printers Row neighborhood. The Reed is...
21 December 2020
Renderings Unveiled For The Reed At Southbank
Renderings have been revealed for The Reed, the second residential tower at Southbank. Located on a 7.5-acre (3.03-hectare), waterfront site, Southbank is a megadevelopment that...
01 October 2020
Skinny 24-Story Office Tower Proposed for Granville Street in Vancouver
Despite the devastating economic effects of COVID-19, downtown Vancouver’s office market remains amongst North America’s tightest and most competitive office markets due to the city’s...
22 September 2020
Green-Walled Vancouver Proposal Shifts to Rental Properties
During a public hearing in early October 2020, Vancouver City Council will deliberate on Westbank’s rezoning application to build a residential tower at 5055 Joyce...
14 August 2019
High-Rise Development Intensifies in Winnipeg’s Entertainment District
Five new high-rise buildings are currently under development in Winnipeg’s downtown area, True North Square. The city’s Sports, Hospitality, and Entertainment District (SHED) is centered...
14 August 2019
High-Rise Development Intensifies in Winnipeg’s Entertainment District
Five new high-rise buildings are currently under development in Winnipeg’s downtown area, True North Square. The city’s Sports, Hospitality, and Entertainment District (SHED) is centered...
01 March 2019
As One Chicago Lakefront Project Gets a New Deadline, Another is Announced
The owner of the Chicago Spire site could have another year to begin developing the lakefront site, four months after a downtown alderman rejected a...
18 June 2020
The CTBUH Turkey Committee presents a discussion on the implications of COVID-19 on the design of construction projects.
26 July 2018
CTBUH Atlanta recently held an evening of panel presentations that addressed some of the challenges and opportunities associated with designing mass timber structures.
01 February 2018
The Chicago Architecture Foundation (CAF) and CTBUH hosted a panel discussion on the movement to incorporate green features into tall buildings.
04 October 2017
CTBUH Dubai and AIA Middle East partnered to host an event that focused on this year's top Middle Eastern architects and interior designers.
08 June 2017
CTBUH joined a CCHRB seminar on "The Heavy Timber High Rise: Building Tall with Wood in the 21st Century," focused on new applications of wood as a structural material.
01 December 2016
The Seattle Chapter of the Young Professionals Committee hosted a site tour of Troy Block, providing significant insight into the relationship of the historical and new.
Subscribe below to receive periodic updates from CTBUH on the latest Tall Building and Urban news and CTBUH initiatives, including our monthly newsletter. Fields with a red asterisk (*) next to them are required.
View our privacy policy